Meet Your Liberal Media:
(click on one of the assholes below to learn more)

 

The Big Five | Prime Time News | Paid Journalists | Ann Coulter | Bill O'Reilly | Sean Hannity | Rush Limbaugh | David Horowitz

Michael Savage | RatherGate | Sinclair Broadcasting | Outfoxed | Fake Media | PIPA Study on Effects of Media Bias

Welcome to the media section of this web site. This area of the site serves to prove once and for all, that not only is there no such thing as a "liberal media" bias, but you'd have to go to much, much smaller, barely funded independent media sources to get any type of liberal slant. The corporate mainstream media today is as Right-Wing as it's ever been - and I'll prove it to you with the facts on this page. So, clean that bullshit propaganda from your shriveled, lied-to conservative, raisin sized brains, and let's take a look at the state of the media today.

The Big Five

You cannot begin a discussion on media bias until you understand who owns the media beamed into our homes and left on our doorsteps each day. As America experiences more and more media consolidation, there are fewer and few diverse voices giving you your 24 hour news, your National Nightly News, your local affiliate Nightly News, your prime time programming, your daily newspaper, your barometer of what is offensive and what be censored...you get the point. These giant corporate entities (which is why non-indy media should be referred to as "corporate media" not mainstream media), are who control what you see, hear and read.

Below is a chart that really gives you an idea of who owns the vast majority of the media. Think about these companies, who runs them, who their board of directors are, who their stockholders are.

Parent Company
General Electric
Time Warner
Walt Disney
Viacom
News Corporation
Background
GE/NBC's ranks No. 1 on the Forbes 500. Prior to its merger with NBC and an alliance with Microsoft, GE specialized in electronics. The peacock owns many New York sports team. It also owns or has equity stakes in many popular websites, including Snap.com and iVillage. The largest media corporation in the world, Time Warner owns film and music production companies, theme parks, sports teams, magazines, websites and book publishers as well as Turner Broadcasting With its 1995 merger with Capital Cities/ABC, Disney has become a fully-integrated media giant. In addition to its theme parks, the company profits from retail outlets, magazines, book publishers, websites, motion pictures, sports teams, TV, cable, radio, music and newspapers Viacom's purchase of Paramount, CBS and Blockbuster Video enables them to use cable, television, movies, comic books, theme parks, music publishing and book publishing to cross-market their products. Broadcasting alone brings in over $6 billion in revenues. CEO Rupert Murdoch's style has inspired respect and fear, and it has also made his multinational ventures in publishing, television and satellite services very successful. The company owns 20th Century Fox, the New York Post, the London Times, TV Guide, many stadiums, the LA Dodgers and five New York sports teams.
Networks Owned

NBC

Includes programming, news and more than 13 TV and radio stations

TURNER BROAD-
CASTING

Includes sports teams, programming, production, retail, book publishing and multimedia
WB
Television Network
ABC
Includes ABC Radio, ABC Video and ABC Network News
CBS
Includes stations, CBS Radio, CBS Telenoticias and CBS Network News
UPN
includes programming and TV stations (50%)

FOX
I ncludes programming and stations
Cable Interests Owns 25-50% of the following:

A & E (with Disney and Hearst)
American Movie Classics (25%)
Biography Channel (with Disney and Hearst)
Bravo (50%)
Bravo International
CNBC
Court TV (with Time Warner)
Fox Sports Net
History Channel (with Disney and Hearst)
Independent Film Channel
MSG Network
MSNBC (50%)
National Geographic Worldwide
News Sport
Prime
Prism (with Rainbow, a subsidiary of Cablevision, and Liberty Media, a subsidiary of TCI)
Romance Classics
Sports Channel Cincinnati, Chicago, Florida, New England, Pacific, Ohio, Philadelphia
HBO (75%)
Cinemax
HBO Direct Broadcast
Court TV (33% with GE)
TBS Superstation
Turner Classic Movies
TNT
Cartoon Network
Comedy Central (37.5% with Viacom)
Sega Channel
OVATION (50%)
Women's Information Television (WIN) (partial)
TVKO (75%)
4 regional all-news channels
CNN
CNN/SI (with Sports Illustrated)
CNNfn (financial network)
CNNRadio
Headline News
Sportsouth
CNN International
CNN Airport Network
Disney Channel
Disney Television (58 hours/week syndicated programming)
Toon Disney
Touchstone Television
A&E (37.5% with Hearst and GE)
Lifetime Network (50%)
ESPN (80% with Hearst)
ESPN2 (80% with Hearst)
ESPN Classic (80% with Hearst)
ESPN West (80% with Hearst)
ESPNews (80% with Hearst)
Buena Vista Television
Biography Channel (with GE and Hearst)
History Channel (37.5% with Hearst and GE)
Classic Sports Network
E! (35%)
Nickelodeon
MTV
M2: Music Television
VH1
Showtime
Nick at Nite's TVLand
Paramount Networks Comedy Central (50% with Time Warner)
TNN: The Nashville Network
Movie Channel
FLIX
All News Channel (50%)
Sundance Channel (45%)
Midwest Sports Channel
CBS Telenoticias (30%)
Home Team Sports (66% with News Corporation)
Fox Family Channel (50%)
Fox News Channel
fx (50% with TCI's Liberty Media)
fxM (50% with TCI's Liberty Media)
Fox Sports Net (25% with TCI, GE and Cablevision)
The National Geographic Channel (50%)
FIT TV Partnership
Regional networks, including TV Guide Channel and Fox Sports New York
(back to top)

Meet the Paid Journalists
Maggie Gallagher | Armstrong Williams | Michael McManus | Jeff Gannon

The last time you saw a news segment that used Bush's talking points, or read an article about how great "No Child Left Behind" is, did it seem as if it was so slanted, the reporter could have been getting paid by the Bush administration? Chances are, he or she probably was.

The Bush administration has been shelling out some of your tax dollars lately to pay some television and newspaper columnists to push it's agenda on talk shows, in print, and anywhere people have access to see, hear, or read one of the three people below. Not only is this practice questionable for the "family values" president...its actually illegal. These stories recieved very little press in the liberal corporate media. Here is rundown of who they are and how much these scumbags were paid:

Gallagher frequently argued in her column in 2002 for Bush’s $300 million initiative to encourage strengthening families through marriage. Meanwhile, the HHS department had her under a $21,500 contract to help promote the proposal. Her contract’s requirements included writing brochures, conducting a briefing for department officials and drafting a magazine article. Gallagher stated that her job was to "emphasize the importance of marriage to poor couples [and] educate teens on the value of delaying childbearing until marriage."

 

Armstrong J.J. "Dynamite!" Williams, former aide to Strom Thurmond, friend of Clarence Thomas, and full-time public relations executive, was hired in 2003 as a political analyst for Sinclair's News Central, which creates broadcasts for that conservative company's 62 local stations across the country. You may remember Sinclair as the company who refused to air Saving Private Ryan on Veterans' Day, 2004, or who wanted to run the lying Swift Boat anti-Kerry propaganda before the election, or the company who blocked Nightline from airing the names of fallen soldiers in the recent Iraq war during it's midnight broadcast.

One of Williams' first interviews as a Sinclair analyst was with outgoing Secretary of Education Rod Paige, during which time the two talked favorably about No Child Left Behind (NCLB), the education reform law passed by President George W. Bush -- and the piece of legislation that the Department of Education paid Williams $240,000 to promote. You can read the USA Today article that broke this story here.

 

One day after President Bush ordered his Cabinet secretaries to stop hiring commentators to help promote administration initiatives, and one day after the second high-profile conservative pundit was found to be on the federal payroll, a third embarrassing emerged. Michael McManus, a marriage advocate whose syndicated column, "Ethics & Religion," appears in 50 newspapers, was hired as a subcontractor by the Department of Health and Human Services to foster a Bush-approved marriage initiative. McManus championed the plan in his columns without disclosing to readers he was being paid to help it succeed.

To date, the Bush administration has paid public relation firms $250 million to help push proposals, according to a report Thursday in USA Today. That's double what the Clinton administration spent on P.R. from 1997 to 2000. Shortly after Williams' contract came to light, the Democrats on the Committee on Government Reform wrote a letter to President Bush demanding that he "immediately provide to us all past and ongoing efforts to engage in covert propaganda, whether through contracts with commentators, the distribution of video news releases, or other means." As of yet, a there has been no response.

 

Oh wait....Almost forgot one....Meet: JEFF GANNON!

I don't even know where to start with this guy. Jeff Gannon, who used an assumed name (his real name has been found to be James Guckert), somehow, in this age of security, in this age of 9/11 scream-for-your life terror, managed to get within speaking distance of President Bush for almost two years. He is from an organization called "Talon News," which isn't really neither an organization, nor a news source as far as anyone can tell. Talon News' editor in chief, Bobby Eberle, is a Republican activist who served as a delegate to the 1996, 1998, and 2000 Texas Republican Conventions and to the 2000 national Republican Convention. In 1999, Eberle "was recognized with a unanimously approved resolution of commendation by the Republican Party of Texas for service and dedication to the Republican cause." Gannon has no journalistic credentials, yet was continually seen asking questions like these:

"Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking about soup lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the economy being on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you've said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?" (Video)

"I'd like to comment on the angry mob that surrounded Karl Rove's house on Sunday. They chanted and pounded on the windows until the D.C. police and Secret Service were called in. The protest was organized by the National People's Action Coalition, whose members receive taxpayer funds, as well as financial support from groups including Theresa Heinz Kerry's Tides Foundation."

"Since there have been so many questions about what the President was doing over 30 years ago, what is it that he did after his honorable discharge from the National Guard? Did he make speeches alongside Jane Fonda, denouncing America's racist war in Vietnam? Did he testify before Congress that American troops committed war crimes in Vietnam? And did he throw somebody else's medals at the White House to protest a war America was still fighting"

FA great article on Jeff Gannon can be found here. Or here, and don't forget here...or here.

(back to top)


OutFoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism


(Who is Rupert Murdoch and why does Fox News suck?)
Who is Rupert Murdoch? | Media Manipulator | Far Right Partisan | Oppressive Regime Supporter | Shady Businessman


For anyone that needs to be acquainted with Fox news in all it's lying, glorious Right-wing bias, I suggest you buy "outfoxed," a documentary that get's inside the corporate media giant and exposes everything from intentionally biased reporting to actual internal Fox memos that encourage the spread of propaganding through the public airwaves, to your brain.

From the Outfoxed web site: "Outfoxed" examines how media empires, led by Rupert Murdoch's Fox News, have been running a "race to the bottom" in television news. This film provides an in-depth look at Fox News and the dangers of ever-enlarging corporations taking control of the public's right to know.

The film explores Murdoch's burgeoning kingdom and the impact on society when a broad swath of media is controlled by one person.

Media experts, including Jeff Cohen (FAIR) Bob McChesney (Free Press), Chellie Pingree (Common Cause), Jeff Chester (Center for Digital Democracy) and David Brock (Media Matters) provide context and guidance for the story of Fox News and its effect on society.

This documentary also reveals the secrets of former Fox News producers, reporters, bookers and writers who expose what it's like to work for Fox News. These former Fox employees talk about how they were forced to push a "right-wing" point of view or risk their jobs. Some have even chosen to remain anonymous in order to protect their current livelihoods. As one employee said, "There's no sense of integrity as far as having a line that can't be crossed." See the trailer here.

Who is Rupert Murdoch? (from the center for American Progress)
In recent years, Australian-born billionaire Rupert Murdoch has used the U.S. government's increasingly lax media regulations to consolidate his hold over the media and wider political debate in America. Consider Murdoch's empire: According to Businessweek, "his satellites deliver TV programs in five continents, all but dominating Britain, Italy, and wide swaths of Asia and the Middle East. He publishes 175 newspapers, including the New York Post and The Times of London. In the U.S., he owns the Twentieth Century Fox Studio, Fox Network, and 35 TV stations that reach more than 40% of the country...His cable channels include fast-growing Fox News, and 19 regional sports channels. In all, as many as one in five American homes at any given time will be tuned into a show News Corp. either produced or delivered." But who is the real Rupert Murdoch? As this report shows, he is a far-right partisan who has used his empire explicitly to pull American political debate to the right. He is also an enabler of the oppressive tactics employed by dictatorial regimes, and a man who admits to having hidden money in tax havens. In short, there more to Rupert Murdoch than meets the eye.

Murdoch the War-Mongerer
Just after the Iraq invasion, the New York Times reported, "The war has illuminated anew the exceptional power in the hands of Murdoch, 72, the chairman of News Corp… In the last several months, the editorial policies of almost all his English-language news organizations have hewn very closely to Murdoch's own stridently hawkish political views, making his voice among the loudest in the Anglophone world in the international debate over the American-led war with Iraq." The Guardian reported before the war Murdoch gave "his full backing to war, praising George Bush as acting 'morally' and 'correctly' and describing Tony Blair as 'full of guts'" for his support of the war. Murdoch said just before the war, "We can't back down now – I think Bush is acting very morally, very correctly." [New York Times, 4/9/03; Guardian, 2/12/03]

Murdoch the Neoconservative
Murdoch owns the Weekly Standard, the neoconservative journal that employed key figures who pushed for war in Iraq. As the American Journalism Review noted, the circulation of Murdoch's Weekly Standard "hovers at only around 65,000. But its voice is much louder than those numbers suggest." Editor Bill Kristol "is particularly adept at steering Washington policy debates by inserting himself and his views into the discussion." In the early weeks of the War on Terror, Kristol "shepherded a letter to President Bush, signed by 40 D.C. opinion-makers, urging a wider military engagement." [Source: AJR, 12/01]

Murdoch the Oil Imperialist
Murdoch has acknowledged his major rationale for supporting the Iraq invasion: oil. While both American and British politicians strenuously deny the significance of oil in the war, the Guardian of London notes, "Murdoch wasn't so reticent. He believes that deposing the Iraqi leader would lead to cheaper oil." Murdoch said before the war, "The greatest thing to come out of this for the world economy...would be $20 a barrel for oil. That's bigger than any tax cut in any country." He buttressed this statement when he later said, "Once [Iraq] is behind us, the whole world will benefit from cheaper oil which will be a bigger stimulus than anything else." [Guardian, 2/17/03]

Murdoch the Intimidator
According to Agence France-Press, "Rupert Murdoch's Fox News Channel threatened to sue the makers of 'The Simpsons' over a parody of the channel's right-wing political stance…In an interview this week with National Public Radio, Matt Groening recalled how the news channel had considered legal action, despite the fact that 'The Simpsons' is broadcast on sister network, Fox Entertainment. According to Groening, Fox took exception took a Simpsons' version of the Fox News rolling news ticker which parodied the channel's anti-Democrat stance with headlines like 'Do Democrats Cause Cancer?'" [Source: Agence France-Press, 10/29/03]

Murdoch the News Editor
"When The New York Post tore up its front page on Monday night to trumpet an apparent exclusive that Representative Richard A. Gephardt would be Senator John Kerry's running mate, the newspaper based its decision on a very high-ranking source: Rupert Murdoch, the man who controls the company that owns The Post, an employee said yesterday. The Post employee demanded anonymity, saying senior editors had warned that those who discussed the Gephardt gaffe with other news organizations would lose their jobs." [NY Times, 7/9/04]

Just as Fox claims to be "fair and balanced," Rupert Murdoch claims to stay out of partisan politics. But he has made his views quite clear – and used his media empire to implement his wishes. As a former News Corp. executive told Fortune Magazine, Murdoch "hungered for the kind of influence in the United States that he had in England and Australia" and that meant "part of our political strategy [in the U.S.] was the New York Post and the creation of Fox News and the Weekly Standard."

Murdoch the Bush Supporter
Murdoch told Newsweek before the war, Bush "will either go down in history as a very great president or he'll crash and burn. I'm optimistic it will be the former by a ratio of 2 to 1…One senses he is a man of great character and deep humility." [Newsweek, 2/17/03]

Murdoch the Bush Family Employer
As Slate reports, Murdoch "put George W. Bush cousin John Ellis in charge of [Fox's] Election Night vote-counting operation: Ellis made Fox the first network to declare Bush the victor" even as the New Yorker reported that Ellis spent the evening discussing the election with George W. and Jeb Bush. After the election, Fox bragged that it attracted 6.8 million viewers on Election Night, meaning Ellis was in a key position to tilt the election for President Bush. [Source: Slate, 11/22/00; New Yorker, 11/20/00]

Murdoch the Mixer of Business and Politics:
James Fallows of the Atlantic Monthly points out that most of Murdoch's actions "are consistent with the use of political influence for corporate advantage." In other words, he uses his publications to advance a political agenda that will make him money. The New York Times reports that in 2001, for example, The Sun, Britain's most widely read newspaper, followed Murdoch's lead in dropping its traditional conservative affiliation to endorse Tony Blair, the New Labor candidate. News Corp.'s other British papers, The Times of London, The Sunday Times and the tabloid News of the World, all concurred. The papers account for about 35% of the newspaper market in Britain. Blair backed "a communications bill in the British Parliament that would loosen restrictions on foreign media ownership and allow a major newspaper publisher to own a broadcast television station as well a provision its critics call the 'Murdoch clause' because it seems to apply mainly to News Corp." [Atlantic Monthly, 9/03; New York Times, 4/9/03]

Murdoch the New York City Political Boss
The Columbia Journalism Review reported that during New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani's first term "News Corp. received a $20.7 million tax break for the mid-Manhattan office building that houses the Post, Fox News Channel, TV Guide and other operations. During Giuliani's 1997 reelection campaign, News Corp. was also angling for hefty city tax breaks and other incentives to set up a new printing plant in New York City. Most dramatically, Giuliani jumped in to aggressively champion News Corp. when it battled Time Warner over a slot for the Fox News Channel on Time Warner's local cable system…Three years into Giuliani's first term, veteran Village Voice political reporter Wayne Barrett asked Post editorial page editor Eric Breindel if the paper had run a single editorial critical of the administration; Breindel, he says, admitted it had not. According to Barrett, the paper pulled off a perfect four-year streak" of not one critical editorial. [Columbia Journalism Review, 6/98]

Murdoch the Defender of Repressive Regimes
The last governor of Hong Kong before it was handed back to China, Chris Patten, signed a contract to write his memoirs with Murdoch's publishing company, HarperCollins. But according to the Evening Standard, when "Murdoch heard that the book, East and West, would say unflattering things about the Chinese leadership, with whom he was doing satellite TV business, the contract was cancelled. It caused a furor in the press - except, of course, in the Murdoch papers, which barely mentioned the story." According to BusinessWeek, internal memos surfaced suggesting the canceling of the contract was motivated by "corporate worries about friction with China, where HarperCollins' boss, Rupert Murdoch, has many business interests." [Evening Standard, 8/13/03; BusinessWeek, 9/15/98]

Murdoch the Apologist for Dictatorships
Time Magazine reported that while Murdoch is supposedly "a devout anti-Soviet and anti-communist" he "became bewitched by China in the early '90s." In an effort to persuade Chinese dictators that he would never challenge their behavior, Murdoch "threw the BBC off Star TV" (his satellite network operating in China) after BBC aired reports about Chinese human rights violations. Murdoch argued the BBC "was gratuitously attacking the regime, playing film of the massacre in Tiananmen Square over and over again." In 1998 Chinese President Jiang Zemin praised Murdoch for the "objective" way in which his papers and television covered China. [Source: Time Magazine, 10/25/99]

Murdoch the Propagandist for Dictators
While Murdoch justifies his global media empire as a threat to "totalitarian regimes everywhere," according to Time Magazine, Murdoch actually pays the salary of a top TV consultant working to improve the Chinese government's communist state-run television CCTV. As Time notes, "nowadays, News Corp. and CCTV International are partners of sorts," exchanging agreements to air each other's content, even though CCTV is "a key propaganda arm of the Communist Party." [Source: Time Magazine, 7/6/04]

Murdoch the Enabalor of Human Rights Violations
According to the LA Times, Murdoch had his son James, now in charge of News Corp.'s China initiative, attack the Falun Gong, the spiritual movement banned by the Chinese government after 10,000 of its followers protested in Tiananmen Square. With Rupert in attendance, James Murdoch called the movement a "dangerous" and "apocalyptic cult" and lambasted the Western press for its negative portrayal of China's awful human rights record. Murdoch "startled even China's supporters with his zealous defense of that government's harsh crackdown on Falun Gong and criticism of Hong Kong democracy supporters." Murdoch also "said Hong Kong democracy advocates should accept the reality of life under a strong-willed 'absolutist' government." It "appeared to some to be a blatant effort to curry favor" with the China's repressive government. [LA Times, 3/23/01]

Murdoch the Hider of Money in Communist Cuba
Despite a U.S. embargo of communist Cuba, the Washington Post reports, "News Corp.'s organizational chart consists of no less than 789 business units incorporated in 52 countries, including Mauritius, Fiji and even Cuba." [Washington Post, 12/7/97]

Murdoch the Union Buster
The Economist reported that in 1986 Murdoch "helped smash the British print unions by transferring the production of his newspapers to a non-union plant at Wapping in East London." The move "proved to be a turning-point in Britain's dreadful industrial relations." AP reported Murdoch specifically "slashed employment levels" at the union plant and said he would "dismiss the 6,000 striking workers" who were trying to force concessions out of the media baron. The London Evening Standard called the tactics "the biggest union-busting operation in history." [Sources: The Economist, 4/18/98; AP, 1/27/86; Evening Standard, 11/12/98]

Murdoch the Corporate Tax Evador
The BBC reported that "Mr. Murdoch's die-hard loyalty to the tax loophole has drawn wide criticism" after a report found that in the four years prior to June 30, 1998, "Murdoch's News Corporation and its subsidiaries paid only $325 million in corporate taxes worldwide. That translates as 6% of the $5.4 billion consolidated pre-tax profits for the same period…By comparison another multi-national media empire, Disney, paid 31%. The corporate tax rates for the three main countries in which News Corp. operates - Australia, the United States and the UK - are 36%, 35% and 30% respectively. Further research reveals that Mr. Murdoch's main British holding company, News Corp. Investments, has paid no net corporation tax within these shores over the past 11 years. This is despite accumulated pre-tax profits of nearly $3 billion." [Source: BBC, 3/25/99]

Murdoch the Lover of Offshore Tax Havens
When a congressional panel asked if he was hiding money in tax havens, including communist Cuba, Murdoch responded "we might have in the past, I'm not denying that." The Washington Post reports, "through the deft use of international accounting loopholes and offshore tax havens, Murdoch has paid corporate income taxes at one-fifth the rate of his chief U.S. rivals throughout the 1990s, according to corporate documents and company officials." Murdoch "has mastered the use of the offshore tax haven." His company "reduces its annual tax bill by channeling profits through dozens of subsidiaries in low-tax or no-tax places such as the Cayman Islands and Bermuda. The overseas profits from movies made by 20th Century Fox, for instance, flow into a News Corp.-controlled company in the Caymans, where they are not taxed." [Source: Congressional Testimony, 5/8/03; Washington Post, 12/7/97]

Murdoch the Abuser of Tax Loopholes
Even though Murdoch changed his citizenship in order to comply with U.S. media ownership rules, many of his companies have remained Australian, allowing them "to utilize arcane accounting rules that have pumped up reported profits and greatly aided Murdoch's periodic acquisition sprees." IRS officials point out that "U.S.-based companies face U.S. taxes on their offshore subsidiaries in the Caymans and elsewhere if more than 50 percent of the subsidiary is controlled by American shareholders. But that doesn't apply to News Corp., an Australian company." [Source: Congressional Testimony, 5/8/03; Washington Post, 12/7/97]

(back to top)


Say Hello to Sinclair Broadcasting


(FAQ about your favorite little media entity)

What is Sinclair Broadcast Group?
Sinclair Broadcast Group is a broadcast company that is in charge of 62 local television stations viewed by 24% of the country. Sinclair owns or operates 20 FOX, 19 WB, eight ABC, six UPN, three CBS, and four NBC affiliates, as well as two independent stations, making them the largest broadcaster in the nation, and therefore quite influential.

Do I have Sinclair where I live?
Check the list here.

Who is that scary guy above?
He is Mark Hyman, one of Sinclair's Vice Presidents. See him in action here, or read about some of the completely insane things he's uttered here.

*Giggle* You said, "Hyman."
Indeed.

How can a broadcast company influence me and others politically?
Several ways. Let's say Sinclair owns WXYZ television station in your town. Sinclair can dictate what programming WXYZ broadcasts, even when the network affiliate is doing something else. So, even if CBS is the network affiliate and it's going to show "A Christmas Story" for the 15th fucking time that day, Sinclair can step in and broadcast a movie depicting Bill Clinton clubbing baby seals.

Also, after your local CBS affiliate does it's nightly news, a Sinclair representative can air a commentary on your channel - kind of like an unsolicited editorial, where only one side is presented. Think of Sinclair like a little evil man inside your television, constantly changing your programming and giving you suggestive commentary in between shows.

You must be joking. Isn't this illegal?
Complaints about the public airwaves are responded to by the FCC. You're typically not allowed to get away with overtly biased opinions as a network or broadcaster, however if you take one part, "disguise the bias shit as news," and one part, "the chairman of the FCC was appointed by the current Bush administration" you have the ingredients ripe for allowing this kind of stuff to occur unchecked.

What are some examples of Sinclair getting away with this fascist bullshit?
Excellent Question:

-Each day after the news, Sinclair airs what is called "the point," with Vice President Mark Hyman. During this time he expresses his conservative opinion regarding a number of political topics, and doesn't ever present a dissenting opinion, as is the policy of most other stations. "The Point" is integrated into all of the "local" evening newscasts on Sinclair-controlled stations. During the 2004 election cycle, Hyman consistently provided false and distortion-filled attacks on Democratic candidate John Kerry. This violates FCC "equal time" rules on a daily basis.

-In April 2004, Sinclair ordered seven of its stations not to air Ted Koppel's Nightline broadcast featuring a roll call of the 700 U.S. troops who had died in Iraq, and one can only assume this was done because Sinclair felt that broadcasting the names would cast a shadow of reality on the war, rather than honor those who died in combat. Republican Sen. John McCain, who was a prisoner of war in Vietnam, was among the many who criticized Sinclair’s action. Read about the whole thing, here.

 -Sinclair pre-empted local television programming to air "Stolen Honor" which was a mud-slinging "documentary" claiming to "expose John Kerry's record of betrayal." The film was made by Carlton Sherwood, a Vietnam veteran and former reporter for the conservative Washington Times. and is funded by a group of conservative activists and is funded by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth Group. This lying Swift Boat Group is shown to have lost almost all credibility, as it cannot prove a single claim it makes with documentation, while the opposing message has been supported by detailed accounts, documents, and anecdotal evidence by those who served with John Kerry in Vietnam. Former FCC Chairman Reed Hundt had this to say about it: "Ordering stations to carry propaganda? It's absolutely off the charts. Any FCC chairman, from the left or the right, would agree with me. I'd be shocked if you could find any other broadcast conduct like this" in the history of American television."

How can I stop Sinclair?
By visiting the following web sites you can find lists of advertisers. Hit them in their fucking pocket book guys.

http://www.stopsinclair.org/

http://www.boycottsbg.com/2004/10/stop-sinclair-broadcasting-group.htm

http://sinclairwatch.net/

(back to top)


The Prime Time Robots

When you engage one of the kool-aid drinking, brainwashed drones from the Right and ask them about their thoughts on the media, they'll tell you this: The Right may completely own AM talk radio, but every other media outlet has a liberal bias. My question back to them is this - have you ever watched cable tv between 8pm and 11pm, every single weeknight, you moron?

I could understand someone making the point that PrimTime TV has a left wing bias, when you turned the dial all you saw was former Democratic members of congress hosting shows - but you don't - instead Joe Scarborough (R-FL) has a show. Or, maybe they'd have a point if former Democratic candidates for President, such as Howard Dean was hosting a show - but, no, instead Pat Buchanan makes the rounds. And Oliver North. And new conservative Dennis Miller. And Bill O'Reilly. And Sean Hannity...etc, etc.

Let's take a look at the programming that is on the big cable news channels each night in Prime Time. C'mon, it'll be fun!

Ratings Key
Neutral. Both progressive and conservative points celebrated. Typically harmless.
Conservative. Show might have animated American flag in background, however anchor is widely seen as fair and balanced.
Very Conservative. Anchor typically scares you into thinking your child may turn gay if he attends public school. Lots of yelling at progressive guests who believe in science, global warming, and fair treatment of all Americans (not just the rich, white ones who make the sign of the cross twice a day). Show refuses to investigate whether or not Laura Bush is a robot.
Super Conservative. Show typically leads with, "look at what Hillary Clinton is up to now" type of story. Zell Miller may be a guest host. Science is despised on this show, as are public schools, social security, and Ted Kennedy. Conservative guests on this show are typically polished, and well versed - the "liberal" guests are scraped from the bottom of tech barrel to make them look angry, less intelligent, and genuinely nuts. At least one story each night of how gay people will break into your home and eat your child if you don't pray them away.
Ape-shit Conservative. Show may start with prayer to Jesus Christ and Pat Robertson. Halo digitally inserted over Bush's head on still shots. Jerry Falwell may guest host. Dissent from the government, free thinking, and meaningful discussion are all squashed, fried in a pan, and served with a tiny American Flag on toothpick. Similar to North Korean talk shows (minus the American flag).




































Cable Channel
8pm
Right-Wing Rating

Countdown w/Keith Olbermann

Keith's show is mildly entertaining and completely unbiased. The show's format consists of counting down the top news stories of the day, ranging from entertainment, to sports, to Michael Jackson touching boys where they pee. In fact, as I write this, I decided to check on Keith's top 5 countdown from today, and show you how benign this show is, in either political direction. 5). Today's Michael Jackson testimony. 4). The new fad of writing serial killers in prison. 3). A tsunami relief golf tournament. 2). Steroid scandal in baseball. 1) .The new trend of "up-skirting," pictures on the Internet .That it. His show is like this every night. How incredibly liberal.Our vote: Neutral.

Paula Zahn Now

As the network anchors retire on-by-one, we are on a saddening trend of losing good, hard core journalists, and replacing them with model-looking actors and actresses who read the news. Paula Zahn is an example of us moving toward that trend. Although most of her show is interview driven, she covers many of the topics the corporate media decide are important - Martha Stewart's prison release, the Michael Jackson trial, cute Christian couples having 11 children in their latest litter ...things like that. Again, no real bias either way - she's not a loud, right wing truth distorter however, which will make the Right consider her to be super-liberal. Our vote: Neutral.

The Factor w/Bill O'Reilly

O'Reilly's show is an hour long clown-fest that involves him bragging about how his show is different from all the rest because it's the "No Spin Zone." The ironic fact is that O'Reilly spins more than almost anyone, and it ends up embarrassing him, like here, here, and here. He lobs softball questions to conservative guests (while trying to make it seem like he's giving them a tough interview), and bullies his more centrist or progressive guests. He often gets his facts completely incorrect, such as his crowning moment was when he told 9/11 victim family member Jeremy Glick to Shut up, cut his mic, then kicked him off the show.

  

Some lame, brain-melting reality tv show. .

Cable Channel
9pm
Right-Wing Rating

Larry King Live

If you're curious about the Laci Peterson trail - would like to know more about Michael Jackson's weird pets and how often he hangs out with small children - if you want to know about the British Royal Family, what Liz Taylor is up to, or just how the hell Jennifer Aniston gets her hair to look so ...shiny - then tune into Larry King. It's like the National Enquirer got a tv show. I remember taking him somewhat seriously about a decade ago, but his show has more gossip now than 7th grade slumber party. Oh, and, for all of you mistakenly thinking this guy is liberal - whenever he has a guest on with ANY particular political ideology, his call screeners make every effort possible to let only the guest's supporters get through.

Live with Tucker Carlson

Tucker Carlson is like the nerd you used to beat the crap out of when the gym teacher wasn't looking. His bow tie, "I've never been laid" look just begs, "please, take my lunch money!." Although he does stick up for himself when confronted by less right-leaning guests, he is actually not a screaming loud-mouth idiot like some of the other pundits on this page. One of his crowning moments didn't even come from his own show - claiming that nobody blames the Pentagon for the lying and deception around Pat Tillman's death (hint: just ask Tillman's family).

  

 

Hannity and Colmes

If you've read Al Franken's latest book, or if you've watched this show for about 3 minutes, you may realize why Colmes is in much smaller font. This deceptive show pits the good-looking, well spoken Sean Hannity, against the ostrich monster with the grasshopper face Alan Colmes. The aesthetic message - conservative assholes are nobel, while progressives have never kissed a woman in their lives. Other than that, the show is set up such that Hannity has much more control than his hand picked assistant, and dominates all of the arguments during each broadcast accordingly.

  

 

Dennis Miller

What in the god damn hell happened to Dennis Miller? Miller used to be funny,
but something happened right around 9/11 that made him drop about 75 IQ points, and adapt the same simple minded, fake-patriotic colon-clenching mentality that he made an entire career out of poking fun at. His conservative soufflé, airing at 9pm on MSNBC consists of on part bashing Howard Dean and Hillary Clinton, one part giving verbal oral sex to President Bush, and two parts cutting off people's sentences who don't praise the Iraq war at least three times during their interview. Dennis - you are no longer funny. You no longer use intelligent humor that used to fly over the heads of all non-intellectuals. You are in fact, dead to me.

  
Cable Channel
10pm
Right-Wing Rating

News Night With Aaron Brown

Aaron Brown is a strange fellow. Not entirely conservative, but kind of an ass. He's like that nerd you used to pick on in high school who actually had the balls to fight back - only to get his ass kicked again and again. Brown gets half a confederate flag because during the debates and during both conventions, he had a negative attitude toward John Kerry and the Democrats. It's like watching Jay Leno for about a half hour - he tries to hide his political ideology but he comes across as someone who doesn't take progressives very seriously. Come out of the closet Aaron - and trade those glasses for a cowboy hat and a Bible. Oh yeah - and take that damn hair piece off your head!

Scarborough Country with Joe Scarborough

Ahh yes, more liberalism from your favorite left-wing network, NBC. Joe Scarborough is a former Republican House of Representatives member from Florida, and I actually don't hate the guy. His politics are completely screwed up, but he's actually quite a nice guy both on his show and in interviews. I heard him get destroyed an in Air America interview once and I thought he was going to cry - I nearly felt bad for him. Make no mistake however, Scarborough is very conservative, and uses his slice of the liberal media to spew out Right-Wing talking points each night.

  

Special Report with Brit Hume

I believe Brit recently got kicked out of this time slot, but he had been in it so long, I feel like writing about him anyway. Brit Hume would be the result of Tom Brokaw, Rush Limbaugh and Frankenstein having a three way, and producing a child that has characteristics of each. He's one of the more conservative Fox hosts, which would is quite obvious to the 11 people who watch his show each night. He's a stiff, dry, boring guy, who hates flag burners and that book-readin' type. Brit's most recent and most outrageous lie can be read about in detail here, or viewed in WMV format here. In short, he actually tried to claim the FDR endorsed private social security accounts when he was alive. Brit Hume, you crack smoker, stop lying to me, I'm not your mother.

  

The Big Deal with Donnie Deutsch

Advertising CEO Donnie Deutsch's show will last another 3-4 weeks if he's lucky. Deutsch mainly covers the incredibly boring niche of business, gossip, and money. No one watches his show and no one cares.
.

  

(back to top)


RatherGate
And the comparison to other famous lies in recent history

Well what about Dan Rather, you ask? All this talk of conservative media and something must be said about Dan Rather's mistakes, right? Well, W. and Dan have more in common than you might think. Both have used allegedly forged documents to sway opinion or support something they were trying to accomplish. So much has been made about what Dan Rather did, entire web sites are popping up to remind us all how much Danny-boy is a lying liberal bastard. Well, W fucked up too, but in a different way. Let's take a look, and we'll even throw Bubba in the mix...

 
Lie Told
Utilized documents claiming to authenticate the fact that Bush did not fulfill his duties in the National Guard.
Lied about an affair in the white house. Utilized documents claiming to authenticate the fact that Iraq was seeking uranium from Niger to make an atomic bomb.
Medium Used to Deliver Lie
60 Minutes II on CBS
Press conferences, interviews, and while under oath. State of the Union Address and Colin Powell's testimony in front of the United Nations
Event Lie Was Used to Justify
CBS news story supporting growing suspicion that Bush was a avoided Vietnam through his father's connections, and did not fulfill his national guard duty.
Covering up an extramarital affair. The military invasion of Iraq
Information Investigation Into Lie Yielded
Documents were almost certainly forged, however the report issued from the committee headed by Bush family friend (as well as Attorney General for Bush I) Richard Thornburgh claimed there was no political bias. Further, the woman who typed the documents, Marian Carr Knox, says the documents were fake but the information contained within them are real, and must have been taken from the real documents.
Clinton porked his porky intern. 100% certainty that documents were forged, as one of the signers of the documents had not been a foreign minister of Niger for over 14 years.
Fallout From Lie
Dan Rather retired early, 4 CBS News executives lost their jobs. CBS and Dan Rather both apologized.
Impeachment.

Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who pointed out that Niger was not seeking a uranium deal with Iraq, had his undercover CIA wife Valerie Plaim outed publicly by someone in the White House - an official act of Treason, which carries a Federal penalty of death.

Support for the Iraq war nearly doubled according to polls among the US population, and among members of congress.

Number of Casualties Resulting From Error
No one trusts CBS News. Zero.

-1,714 dead U.S. Solders (and counting)

-11,200 (est.) injured U.S. Soldiers

- Est 60,000 dead Iraqi Civilians

(back to top)


From time to time, something is revealed about the Bush administration that is so counter-democratic, you have to wonder why people are shocked when Hitler's name is mentioned alongside Bush's.

When people do make the comparison, they're obviously not taking about concentration camps, or the outright hatred for minorities (I honestly think Bush doesn't hate anyone - I think he completely misunderstands). Instead, they're drawing up the comparisons because Hitler was a master propagandist. Hitler knew that in order to control the free thinking of a nation - in order to cover up lies and get people to conform, you had to control the media. If people don't have access to free and mostly unbiased information, they don't have control over their own thoughts and opinions.

That's why when two particular discoveries of propaganda used by the White House were unveiled, it cast a light on the Bush Administration unlike we've ever really seen in American history: Fake News, and Fake Town Hall Meetings.


Fake News


What exactly is the Bush administration doing?
Cranked up to full speed in the months before the presidential campaign really got going, the New York Times published an in-depth expose shedding light on the White House's use of fake news propaganda - the bulk of which included prepackaged, carefully produced news segments that openly praised Bush administration policies, such as No Child Left Behind, the war in Iraq, and other controversial initiatives. These pieces of media were sent to various television stations, and were subsequently aired without any indication actors hired by the the White House, not genuine news subjects, were centerpieces of the footage.

Where can you see this type of thing?
Some of the segments were broadcast in some of nation's largest television markets, including New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas and Atlanta, typically aired on 6, 10, or 11 o'clock news.

To what extent is the White House engaging in this type of propaganda?
Over the past four years, it turns out at least 20 different federal agencies have been involved in producing hundreds – yes, hundreds – of fake TV news segments, many of which were "subsequently broadcast on local stations across the country without any acknowledgement of the government's role in their production."

Is fake news being subsidized by my Tax Dollars?
The Bush administration has spent one quarter of a billion dollars in taxpayer funds to produce phony government PR. Since President Bush took office in 2001, the White House has spent at least $254 million on fake "news" segments and other public relations schemes. In a now-infamous segment by the Department of Health and Human Services, a PR official named Karen Ryan posed as a reporter interviewing then-Secretary Tommy Thompson. The Government Accountability Office found the agency "designed and executed" her segments "to be indistinguishable from news stores produced by private sector television news organizations," according to the Times.

Isn't government sponsored propaganda illegal?
The administration willfully violates government restrictions on "covert propaganda." The non-partisan Government Accounting Office, the non-partisan investigative branch of Congress, has forbidden federal agencies from creating prepackaged news reports "that conceal or do not clearly identify for the television viewing audience that the agency was the source of those materials." The administration's response? The NY Times reports that on Friday, "the Justice Department and the Office of Management and Budget circulated a memorandum instructing all executive branch agencies to ignore the GAO findings."

Why doesn't the GAO do something about this?
These fake news spots are produced with taxpayer money by outside public relations firms. Federal law warns federal agencies away from doing exactly that; the U.S. Code states "appropriated funds may not be used to pay a publicity expert unless specifically appropriated for that purpose." However, the GAO, which monitors the law, has no enforcement power. That responsibility lies with Congress and the White House. U.S. federal law also contains the Smith Mundt Act of 1948, which prohibits the spread of government propaganda in the United States (although it allows groups like Voice of America to broadcast it to foreign audiences.) According to the NY Times, State Department officials claim that provision doesn't apply to them.


Fake Campaign Stops

During the 2004 campaign, the Bush administration campaigned on the road in front of pre-screened, screaming fans as if they thought the Beatles had just walked on stage for the first time. At campaign stops across the country, the Bush-Cheney campaign practiced a Republicans-only policy, barring individuals that disagree with the President from public campaign events. The Republican National Committee has even required event-attendees to sign endorsement forms that pledge their support for the re-election of Bush.

Whether you’re a World War II veteran, a pro-choice independent, a grieving mother, a FEMA worker, or even a high school student, if you questioned Bush’s leadership or didn't belong to his political party, you didn't have the right to see your president, ask him questions and understand where he stands on the issues. What follows is a sampling of stories, from across the country, of individuals banned from Bush’s campaign events:

Republican National Committee Requires Voters To Sign Loyalty Oaths
The Republican National Committee is requiring voters to sign endorsement forms before they attend campaign rallies featuring Vice President Cheney or President Bush. When Vice President Dick Cheney spoke on July 31st to a crowd of 2,000 in Rio Rancho, NM, voters were required to sign an endorsement form in order to receive a ticket to hear Cheney “Whose vice president is he?” asked a 72-year-old John Wade. “I just wanted to hear what my vice president had to say, and they make me sign a loyalty oath.” The form’s endorsement begins, “I, ___,” requiring individuals to state their name, position, hometown and state, “do hereby endorse George W. Bush for re-election of the United States.” Attendees then date and sign the form. A disclaimer box underneath the signature line states, “In signing the above endorsement you are consenting to use and release of your name by Bush-Cheney as an endorser of President Bush.”

The Secret Service Has Banned Anti-Bush Protesters Since September 2001
The Secret Service has actively barred individuals from protesting President Bush since he took office in early 2001. Individuals across the country have been banned from displaying anti-Bush messages at dozens of appearances. The ACLU filed a suit against the Secret Service in September 2003, seeking an injunction against the Bush administration from sequestering protestors at the president’s public appearances. Most recently in West Virginia, a FEMA worker and her husband were arrested for wearing anti-Bush t-shirts at a public appearance billed by Bush as a presidential visit. The couple were forcibly removed from the event and arrested. Witold Walczak, a lawyer who has filed suit against the Secret Service for the ACLU, said that since the event was a presidential visit, it made it “an even more glaring violation of the First Amendment.” [Charleston Gazette, 7/14/04; Cox News Service, 9/23/03]

Cheney Campaign Worker Demanded To Know Race of Asian American Newspaper Photographer
A Cheney campaign worker called the Arizona Daily Star to check the name, date of birth, social security number and race of a photographer assigned to cover a political event that the Vice President would attend in Tucson. The paper, which had never been questioned on the race of a journalist before, refused to answer the question. The Asian American Journalist Association’s [AAJA]national officers issued a statement saying that “the demand bordered on racial profiling.” Abe Kwok, AAJA vice president for print, said he was “troubled at published reports that the inquiry of race as made of some journalists and not others.” A Bush-Cheney campaign spokesman said the request came from the Secret Service, but reporters and photographers are usually asked to provide only name, date of birth and Social Security number when requesting access to political events. The paper was told that the journalist’s race was “necessary to allow the Secret Service to distinguish her from someone else who might have the same name.” “It was a very lame excuse,” said Terry Hayt, the paper’s managing editor. [PR Newswire, 8/3/04, Newsday, 8/3/04; Arizona Daily Star, 7/31/04]


High School Students Threatened At Bush Campaign Event: “A Sniper” Could “Take Him Out”
John Sachs, an 18-year old high school senior went to see Bush in Clive, IA. Sachs got a ticket to the event from school and wanted to ask the president about whether there would be a draft, about the war in Iraq, Social Security and Medicare. At the event, a campaign staffer pulled Sachs aside and made him remove his button that read: ‘Bush-Cheney '04: Leave No Billionaire Behind.’ “The staffer quizzed him about whether he was a Bush supporter, asked him why he was there and what questions he would be asking the president. ‘Then he came back and said, 'If you protest, it won't be me taking you out. It will be a sniper,' Sachs said. ‘He said it in such a serious tone it scared the crap out of me.’” [Des Moines Register, 10/16/04]

Family of Three Was Kicked Out Of Bush Event For Bringing A Pro-Choice T-Shirt.
The Millers, a family of three - husband, wife and daughter – were removed from a Bush-Cheney campaign event because the wife, Barbara Miller, brought a pro-choice t-shirt with her. A campaign worker confiscated the t-shirt informing the family that “We don't accept any pro-choice, non-Republican paraphernalia.” The campaign worker returned an hour later with another worker and a security guard and accused the Millers of “smuggling t-shirts.” Barbara Miller, who brought the t-shirt because she was cold and had not considered the implications of its pro-choice logo, reports that a guard grabbed their three tickets from her hand and ripped them up “violently and told her, ‘They’re no good anymore.’” A Bush campaign spokeswoman, Jennifer Millerwise, defended the right of the campaign to ask individuals who intend to “disrupt campaign events” to leave. "These events are put on ... for people of an open mind who are interested in hearing [Bush's] positive message and his vision for a future," she said. Theresa Miller, the daughter, said that was what she was there to do. “I'm not an American? I can't see my president?” she asked. [Saginaw News, 8/6/04]

Campaign Staff Prevent Democrats And Independents From Attending July 13th Bush-Cheney Rally In Duluth, MN.
Bush-Cheney campaign staff, trying to ensure a friendly crowd for Bush’s rally in Duluth, would not hand out tickets to Democrats or Independents, if they admitted that they weren’t sure they were voting for Bush. Many residents were angered that only Republicans would be given the opportunity to attend the Bush-Cheney rally. A Duluth resident, Jan Witte, questioned who Bush really represented. “He’s my president too… I just thought I should be able to hear him speak.” [AP, 7/10/04]

National Guard Veteran Asked to Leave Rally
Tim Walz, a 23 year National Guard veteran wanted to hear his commander-in-chief. He was allowed into the quarry event after the two young men he was escorting were told to leave the event because one of the young men had a Kerry sticker in his wallet. When Walz objected he was first told to leave as well. Then, a Bush official asked if he supported the President. When he said he did not, the Bush official told him he had to leave as well and he was threatened with arrest. When he informed the official that he had just returned from overseas, the official begrudgingly allowed him to stay with the admonition that the Secret Service would be watching him. [Minneapolis-St. Paul Star Tribune, 8/13/04]

Fake Town Hall Meetings

What about Fake Town Hall Meetings?
Like it's older cousins Fake Campaign stops, and Fake News, the Fake Town Hall Meetings involve deception and manipulation, and have been used by the Bush administration since the middle of his first term.

What happens at these meetings?
Typically a public, tax payer-funded building is filled with pre-screened guests, with pre-screened statements and questions for the President, who enters dramatically, banters playfully with the "audience," and exits to thunderous applause. Like the Fake News segments, issues important for the administration are discussed, spun, and eaten up by the crowed of volunteers, and in some cases, paid actors. It's like an infomercial for the President - all sponsored by the local town holding the event, and caught on film to air in nightly news spots.

Since the term "Town Hall" implies open discussion by the community, can anyone attend?
Absolutely not. As we saw with Bush's campaign speeches in 2004, audiences are typically pre-screened, and tickets are only given to Bush supporters. In fact, those with dissenting opinions have been forcibly asked to leave such town hall meetings.

How does the administration screen the attendees?
Ask Linda Coates, of Fargo North Dakota. Coates, a city commissioner with an openly liberal background, said the administration is going way beyond protecting the president from hecklers and security threats. In fact, she found herself on a list of North Dakotans "banned" from a February Bush rally days before the event.
The list reportedly was found in boxes of tickets for distribution. It included two high school students, a librarian, a Democratic campaign manager and several university professors — the majority of whom had connections to a local group called Democracy for America.


University of Maryland's PIPA Study
A closer look at the correlation between Right wing media, and stupidity

Introduction | PIPA Objectives | Results of the Study | Pretty Graphs

Introduction
Through the past couple of years, I have watched a lot of Fox News and listened to AM hate-radio a little bit each week to try and get a glimpse into what your average Joe Republican listens to on a daily basis. Given the information regarding Fox News above, there may be some who are thinking, "what's the harm in having a Right wing news organization?"

The assumption is that the American public is intelligent enough to weed out the facts from the fiction, and that when Bill O'Reilly screams red-faced at the camera that gay marriage will start an avalanche of incest and cannibalism, that people know to smile, think "poor guy," and change the channel.

Not so. The University of Maryland's Program on International Policy Attitudes or PIPA conducted a series of surveys, studies, and polling since June 2003 regarding perceptions of foreign policy as it relates to information people get from the media. Some of the most interesting results came from the tainted minds of those who watch...Fox News.

While these results are hardly shocking, they do confirm the concern that propaganda and misinformation breeds ignorance when fed through through echoing the taking points of conservative think tanks filtered through channels like Fox News, the New York Post, the Washington Times, NBC's nightly cable talk, conservative television broadcasters that own more than half of what we watch on tv, conservative corporate Movie Theatre chain owners, AM talk radio, and dozens of right-wing publishing companies that fill up your local Borders shelves.

Objectives of the Study
Specifically, the PIPA study, titled "Misperceptions, the Media and the Iraq War," focused on three questions in particular:

Keep in mind, while the questions used words such as "impression," and "do you think," everyone should have known the firm, factual answers to these questions, even when the study was conducted. They are:

(If you got at least one wrong don't feel too bad: only 30% of people surveyed in three polls in June, July, and August-September got all three correct).

Summary of Findings

1. Misperceptions are widely-held:

2. Misperceptions are strongly correlated with support for the war. Specifically, both pre- and post-war, support for the war is much higher among those who are wrong about the facts:

3. Misperceptions correlate strongly with media source (see chart & graph below)

 

# of Misconceptions
Fox News
CBS
ABC
CNN
NBC
Print Media
NPR/PBS
None
20%
30%
38%
45%
45%
53%
77%
1 of 3 or more
80%
71%
61%
55%
55%
47%
23%
2 of 3 or more
69%
51%
41%
38%
34%
26%
13%
3 of 3
45%
15%
16
13%
12%
9%
4%

or, put another way...

The data above also show that these differences aren't explained by different viewer demographics. For example, the average incorrect answer rate was 54% for Republican Fox viewers, but only 32% for Republicans who get their news from PBS-NPR. Viewer education levels also don't account for the differences between the media sources. The amount of attention people pay to the news has little effect on the results, except in the case of print media and to some extent CNN, where more attention results in being better informed, and Fox News, where paying more attention to the news actually increases the likelihood of being misinformed.

More in Depth Analysis of Results
Be sure to link this part of the page to your nearest Bush or Fox News supporter. This data is INCREDBLY revealing, and answers the question, "how can anyone vote for this guy?"

Evidence that about half of America actually still believe this myth

Even after the invasion, 69% of Americans still believe Saddam was directly involved in 9/11. Many of this same 69% had their hearts broken the very next month.

Disturbing: almost HALF of those polled think Europe either favored, or is evenly split over the US invading Iraq

More disturbing: MORE than half actually think the world is in favor or evenly split over the US invading Iraq

 

I suppose this graph states the obvious - the more you think Iraq had something to do with September 11, the more you want to bypass the UN and attack them anyway
Here are the people that support the unilateral attacks mentioned to the left. And...It's FOX NEWS by a nose!

 

The more you watch Fox, the more you think that the US actually found WMD's in Iraq

The more you watch Fox's coverage of the Iraq invasion, the more you think the world community supports us for doing it.

 

One of my favorites - explicit scientific evidence that those who planned to vote for W had over 3 times the rate of misperceptions of key issues regarding the Iraq war.

Bush supporters vs Democratic Candidate X supporters and their likelihood to be completely wrong in their beliefs about key issues.

 

And finally, saving the most interesting for last: PIPA showed that the more news Bush supporters watched, the more likely they were to be completely wrong about key issues. The less news democrats watched, the more likely they were to be kept in the dark.

In other words, the Democrats being misinformed had their excuse: they didn't pay attention. The misinformed Bush supporters had theirs: They watched too much Right Wing News!

 

If you would like to read the full PIPA questionnaire as it was presented, go here.
(back to top)


 Meet Ann Coulter   

Intro: Of all the people listed on this page, Ann is the only one who most honest, God-fearing, gay-loathing conservatives try to distance themselves from. It's not that she's the most hateful; they praise that on the right. It's that she's says things that are so completely untrue, so completely fabricated, and so completely unsupported, that she often can't defend her own points without her audience, and even some supporters laughing at her. Born in 1961 (or 1963 depending on whether or not you believe her D.C. license, or her NY licence) she is typically seen whoring around all the morning and evening talk shows, frequently appearing on conservative shows like Dennis Miller's, Joe Scarborough's, Hannity and Colmes, Brit Hume's, and Bill O'Reilly's. You know, the prime time news shows that make up the liberal media. She is not only a vile, disgusting human being - but is probably the only woman who I would punch in the face, unprovoked.

Likes: Anything Christian, throwing up after medium sized meals, lying, doing coke with Bill Maher, fetuses, defending fake journalism absolutely, unequivocally, hating herself.

Dislikes:Writing anything truthful, people of color, civil rights leaders, the New York Times.

Most Interesting Lie or Hypocrisy: Coulter once claimed in an October 28, 2004 syndicated column that there were more WMD's found in Iraq than disenfranchised black voters in Florida during the 2000 election. The independent, bipartisan United States Commission on Civil Rights had found in a recent report that numerous people of color, including blacks, were disenfranchised during the 2000 presidential election. By contrast, one small canister of saran gas was found in Iraq, leftover from 1980's war with Iran. But don't take my word for it, read the USCCR report here.

Quotes from Ann:


-
"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war." -September 13, 2001

-
"God gave us the earth. We have dominion over the plants, the animals, the trees. God said, 'Earth is yours. Take it. Rape it. It's yours.'" -Hannity & Colmes, 6/20/01

-
"Liberals become indignant when you question their patriotism, but simultaneously work overtime to give terrorists a cushion for the next attack and laugh at dumb Americans who love their country and hate the enemy." -Unknown Date

-
“It’s not terrorism that’s bad, it’s Muslims who are bad. And Christianity will make them good. Those crusades in the 11th and 12th centuries, they were great for world peace weren’t they?” -September 13, 2001, National Review Online

-
"The swing voters---I like to refer to them as the idiot voters because they don't have set philosophical principles. You're either a liberal or you're a conservative if you have an IQ above a toaster. " -Beyond the News, Fox News Channel, 6/4/00

-